Re: Tests

[Fred Kiefer]

I did not get around to test your code on MacOSX, but tried to do so on 
my 64bit OpenSuse 12.1 with gcc 4.6.
First I had to set a few environment variable to get the test to compile 
without installing corebase. You could copy code for that from the base 
GNUmakefile. It would also be great to be able to run make check 
directly from the main directory.

Next I did get a lot of compiler warnings from the CFArray tests.

and finally a lot of the tests failed. For details see the attached 
test.log. Her the test output:

Checking for presence of test subdirectories ...
--- Running tests in CFArray ---

CFArray/create.m:
Failed test:     create.m:18 ... Found 1 occurence of the value.
Failed test:     create.m:21 ... Found value.

CFArray/mutablearray.m:
Failed test:     mutablearray.m:31 ... Array sorted correctly.
--- Running tests in CFCalendar ---

CFCalendar/basic.m:
Failed test:     basic.m:18 ... Absolute time composed correctly.
--- Running tests in CFLocale ---

CFLocale/values.m:
Failed file:     values.m aborted without running all tests!
--- Running tests in CFNumber ---
--- Running tests in CFNumberFormatter ---

CFNumberFormatter/format.m:
Failed test:     format.m:60 ... Double formatted correctly
--- Running tests in CFRuntime ---
--- Running tests in CFString ---

CFString/format.m:
Failed test:     format.m:28 ... Float/Doubles are formatted correctly
--- Running tests in CFTimeZone ---
--- Running tests in CFURL ---

CFURL/create.m:
Failed test:     create.m:27 ... Windows style file URL C:\WINDOWS is 
file://localhost/C:%5CWINDOWS/
Failed test:     create.m:30 ... Resource specifier of C:\WINDOWS is 
//localhost/C:%5CWINDOWS/
Failed test:     create.m:33 ... File system path is C:\WINDOWS\
Failed test:     create.m:45 ... File URL /usr is file://localhost/usr/
Failed test:     create.m:48 ... Resource Specifier of /usr is 
//localhost/usr/
Failed test:     create.m:91 ... Strict path of 
http://www.w3.org/silly-file-name is silly-file-name

CFURL/ref_resolution.m:
Failed test:     ref_resolution.m:41 ... ./g resolved against 
http://a/b/c/d;p?q is http://a/b/c/g
Failed test:     ref_resolution.m:69 ... ../.. resolved against 
http://a/b/c/d;p?q is http://a/
Failed test:     ref_resolution.m:76 ... ../../g resolved against 
http://a/b/c/d;p?q is http://a/g
Failed test:     ref_resolution.m:83 ... ../../../../g resolved against 
http://a/b/c/d;p?q is http://a/g
Failed test:     ref_resolution.m:90 ... /./g resolved against 
http://a/b/c/d;p?q is http://a/g
Failed test:     ref_resolution.m:97 ... /../g resolved against 
http://a/b/c/d;p?q is http://a/g
Failed test:     ref_resolution.m:111 ... ./../g resolved against 
http://a/b/c/d;p?q is http://a/b/g
--- Running tests in CFUUID ---

    143 Passed tests
     19 Failed tests
      1 Failed file


Some testing was abandoned when a test program aborted.  This is
generally a severe problem and may mean that the package is
completely unusable.  You need to try to fix this and, if it is
not due to some problem on your system, please help by submitting
a patch (or at least a bug report) to the package maintainer.

One or more tests failed.  None of them should have.
Please submit a patch to fix the problem or send a bug report to
the package maintainer.

On 23.01.2012 15:43, Stefan Bidi wrote:
> It has been a week and I have not gotten any feedback, one way or another.
> I would really appreciate if people interested on the project to could
> please test it.  The priority right now is to verify that the tests are
> correct.  Running these tests on OS X and reporting back would do that.  I
> understand the core libraries are getting scrubbed now and that is taking
> up most of the available time, but this should only take a few minutes.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Stefan Bidi<stefanbidi@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> > I do not have a machine with OS X installed, so I'm a bit at a
> > disadvantage when it comes to writing tests.  To prepare for the 0.1
> > release of corebase, I'd like to make sure the tests in the test suite are
> > correct and that they test things people are actually using.  I would
> > really appreciate if people could run the test suite on OS X and report
> > back, patches would be nice.  If you have commit access to SVN, feel free
> > commit changes yourself.  If you have a particular use case, new tests
> > would be even more welcome.
> >
> > Really, anything would be helpful.  For CFURL, for example, I just ported
> > some tests from the base test suite (it fails a bunch of stuff, but it's a
> > start).
> >
> > Thanks
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep

tests.log
Description: Text Data