[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter...
From: |
Riccardo Mottola |
Subject: |
Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter... |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:10:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:23.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/23.0 SeaMonkey/2.20 |
Hi,
Gregory Casamento wrote:
I've been developing on GNUstep for many years and it's never been a
matter of editing a configuration file in order to get anything to work.
I develop on GNUstep for just a little less than you, but perhaps
touched more platforms with it (although you used to run it on nice
stuff too, remember Palermo?) and essentially all what was needed was
getting the right dependencies and the correct configure + make
parameters and flags.
You may "tweak" GNUstep conf, make.conf, isntallation domains. But that
is tweaking the behaviour to your needs, you should get a working
environment without touching them.
The goals of GNUstep are quite clear. Our goal is to create an API
which is a clone of the latest version of Cocoa and to provide the
best development environment on as many operating systems as we can.
Clone API-wise: that is, if we implement sometehing, it needs to behave
as Cocoa. We may have additions that Cocoa doesn't have and the
interface may be different, but the same code shall run.
(E.g. we might not have Drawers, but our more OpenStep like Panel based
implementation needs to behave the same)
Regarding the "Trying to support everything" question... this is
actually not what is time consuming. The problem mainly is that Cocoa
is a moving target and it moves quickly. We are 10-20 developers
working part time on a project which has no funding and no company
which formally backs it. The one thing we do get is a lot of feedback
and absolutely no help. So, my suggestion is, if you're interested
in making GNUstep easier to use and better on your particular
platform, then join us and start doing so.
Exactly. I subscribe to this paragraph. Also "feedback" can be of more
constructive one, with precise reports, reporducible stuff. Just saying
"it is dead" or "it doesn't work" is of no help.
Good patches, separate, incremental is of course what is most desired.
Riccardo
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter..., (continued)
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter..., Dr Slivnik Tomaž MA (Cantab) MMath (Cantab) PhD (Cantab) FTICA, 2013/08/09
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter..., Gregory Casamento, 2013/08/09
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter..., Dr Slivnik Tomaž MA (Cantab) MMath (Cantab) PhD (Cantab) FTICA, 2013/08/09
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter..., Riccardo Mottola, 2013/08/09
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter..., Dan Hitt, 2013/08/09
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter..., James Carthew, 2013/08/09
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter..., Riccardo Mottola, 2013/08/09
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter...,
Riccardo Mottola <=
- Message not available
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter..., William F. Adams, 2013/08/14
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter..., Riccardo Mottola, 2013/08/14
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter..., David Chisnall, 2013/08/15
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter..., Sebastian Reitenbach, 2013/08/09
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter..., David Chisnall, 2013/08/09
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter..., James Carthew, 2013/08/09
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter..., Riccardo Mottola, 2013/08/09
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter..., Stephen Woolerton, 2013/08/09
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter..., Gregory Casamento, 2013/08/08
- Re: Comments on the website from people on twitter..., Germán Arias, 2013/08/09