[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E4)
From: |
Richard Frith-Macdonald |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E4) |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:08:36 +0000 |
> On 7 Mar 2016, at 14:02, Wolfgang Lux <wolfgang.lux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Am 07.03.2016 um 11:18 schrieb Richard Frith-Macdonald
>> <richard.frith-macdonald@brainstorm.co.uk>:
>>
>>
>>> On 6 Mar 2016, at 12:20, Bertrand Dekoninck <bertrand.dekoninck@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Addicting saga. I'm eager to see S2.
>>>>
>>>> But now I got:
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> base/NSNumber/test02.m:
>>>> Failed test: test02.m:31 ... rounding 0.009
>>>> Failed test: test02.m:37 ... rounding 0.019
>>>> Failed test: test02.m:51 ... rounding 0.0009
>>>> Failed test: test02.m:57 ... rounding 0.0019
>>>> --- Running tests in base/NSNumberFormatter ---
>>>>
>>>> base/NSNumberFormatter/basic10_4.m:
>>>> Failed test: basic10_4.m:145 ... negativeFormat used for -ve number
>>
>> I can't reproduce that on my system.
>> Perhaps you could send me the relevant part of the log file (which should
>> show provide more info) ?
>
> I'm surprised that you cannot reproduce this. I can reproduce it on Ubuntu
> 14.04. The relevant line from tests.log is:
> Failed test: basic10_4.m:145 ... negativeFormat used for -ve number
> Expected '(R$1.235)' and got '_R$1.235'
>
> The string '_R$1.235' looks correct to me: The number formatter style was set
> to a currency, the locale is pt_BR, and the negative prefix was set to an
> underscore before. I'm unable to see how this could ever produce the expected
> output '(R$1.235)'.
Sorry, that's a poor quote on my part, I was referring to the new failures:
>>>> Failed test: test02.m:31 ... rounding 0.009
>>>> Failed test: test02.m:37 ... rounding 0.019
>>>> Failed test: test02.m:51 ... rounding 0.0009
>>>> Failed test: test02.m:57 ... rounding 0.0019
And should have omitted the old one about the negative format.
- GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E3), Tristan Bellogi, 2016/03/03
- Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E3), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2016/03/04
- Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E3), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2016/03/04
- Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E3), Stefan Bidigaray, 2016/03/04
- Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E4), Tristan Bellogi, 2016/03/06
- Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E4), Bertrand Dekoninck, 2016/03/06
- Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E4), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2016/03/07
- Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E4), Wolfgang Lux, 2016/03/07
- Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E4),
Richard Frith-Macdonald <=
- Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E4), Bertrand Dekoninck, 2016/03/07
- Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E4), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2016/03/07
- Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E4), Bertrand Dekoninck, 2016/03/07
- Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E4), Wolfgang Lux, 2016/03/08
- Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E4), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2016/03/08
- Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E4), Bertrand Dekoninck, 2016/03/08
- Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E4), Tristan Bellogi, 2016/03/08
- Re: GNUstep on a fresh Debian (S1-E4), Tristan Bellogi, 2016/03/07