dolibarr-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Dolibarr-dev] setEventMessages instead of setEventMessage


From: Marcos García
Subject: Re: [Dolibarr-dev] setEventMessages instead of setEventMessage
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 12:26:23 +0200

But the question was why will we remove the string? ~ 90 % of usage is just a string. And I don't get why moving to arrays if we only use strings.

Regards,
 
Marcos García
address@hidden

2014-09-24 17:23 GMT+02:00 Destailleur Laurent <address@hidden>:
We must be able to provide BOTH the string and the array, that are 2
different content during the same call.
This for a transitionnal need.

In future the string will be forgotten.


2014-09-22 1:59 GMT+02:00 Marcos García <address@hidden>:
> But what is the problem with having an string or and array in the same
> argument? An is_array check should be made but I think that is more
> comfortable than using 2 params... Another way could be using
> setEventMessage for string and setEventMessages for a set of strings...
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Marcos García
>
> address@hidden
>
>
> 2014-09-22 1:08 GMT+02:00 Destailleur Laurent <address@hidden>:
>>
>> If you do so, you must provide a string XOR an array.
>> In past only string was used. More and more we try to store errors into
>> array.
>> But for a transition need, we need both parameters (a lot of part of
>> code currently store error into string AND other errors into array).
>> So we need to provide both type at same time to function.
>>
>> 2014-09-22 1:00 GMT+02:00 Marcos García <address@hidden>:
>> > Hi:
>> >
>> > I've noticed that setEventMessage is now a deprecated function and
>> > setEventMessages should be used instead.
>> >
>> > Its signature is
>> >  function setEventMessages($mesg, $mesgs, $style='mesgs')
>> > where $mesg is for a string and $mesgs is filled when we want to attach
>> > an
>> > array of messages.
>> >
>> > My question is... why doing this and not doing a setEventMessage where
>> > the
>> > first param can be either an array or a string? I must say I don't
>> > really
>> > like functions that act differently depending on 1st or 2nd param
>> > filled.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> >
>> > Marcos García
>> >
>> > address@hidden
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Dolibarr-dev mailing list
>> > address@hidden
>> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Laurent Destailleur (alias Eldy)
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Social networks of my OpenSource projects:
>> Dolibarr Google+: https://plus.google.com/+DolibarrOrg/
>> Dolibarr Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/dolibarr
>> Dolibarr Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/dolibarr
>> AWStats Google+: https://plus.google.com/+AWStatsOrgPoject/
>> AWStats Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/awstats.org
>> AWStats Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/awstats_project
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dolibarr-dev mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dolibarr-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
>



--
Laurent Destailleur (alias Eldy)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Social networks of my OpenSource projects:
Dolibarr Google+: https://plus.google.com/+DolibarrOrg/
Dolibarr Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/dolibarr
Dolibarr Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/dolibarr
AWStats Google+: https://plus.google.com/+AWStatsOrgPoject/
AWStats Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/awstats.org
AWStats Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/awstats_project

_______________________________________________
Dolibarr-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]