[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Re: X as WOS
From: |
Mario D. Santana |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Re: X as WOS |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:14:35 -0800 |
Adam,
> hmm... I've been pondering having
> applications/services/databases/components be synced with each other by
> using some sort of Sync'ing language over Jabber. Anyone know of an XML
> Lnaguage for the sync'ing of databases or directories? this could be
> easily routed over Jabber between the various components of the system.
What guarantees does jabberd give of a particular message's full and
successful propagation through the p2p network, i.e. of it's arrival at
all the nodes? This is basically a 2-phase commit, and though for some
services it may not be worth the overhead, other services (e.g., auth)
will probably need a strong guarantee of sane behavior in pathological
cases like splits.
This is a question I've been wrestling with for a while in regards to
macs. It's a pretty thorny set of issues, but I don't see any reference
to it at the jabber site?
Cheers!
mds
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: MOSIX as WOS, (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: MOSIX as WOS, David Nicol, 2001/10/17
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: MOSIX as WOS, Bill Lance, 2001/10/17
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: MOSIX as WOS, David Nicol, 2001/10/17
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: MOSIX as WOS, Norbert Bollow, 2001/10/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: MOSIX as WOS, Bill Lance, 2001/10/18
- [DotGNU]PVM as WOS, David Nicol, 2001/10/18
- [DotGNU]Re: PVM as WOS, Norbert Bollow, 2001/10/19
- [DotGNU]X as WOS, David Nicol, 2001/10/19
- [DotGNU]Re: X as WOS, Norbert Bollow, 2001/10/20
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: X as WOS, Adam Theo, 2001/10/30
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: X as WOS,
Mario D. Santana <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: X as WOS, Adam Theo, 2001/10/30
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: X as WOS, Mario D. Santana, 2001/10/31
- [DotGNU]Jabber as general transport (was Re: X as WOS), Norbert Bollow, 2001/10/30
- [DotGNU]NNTP as rsync, David Nicol, 2001/10/30
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: MOSIX as WOS, Bill Lance, 2001/10/18