Re: [DotGNU]Re: Why DotGNU should use Jabber

[Gopal.V]

If memory serves me right, John wrote:
> > Now, if the data was binary, Jabber could still help by doing the
> > metadata associated with that binary data, such as sending/receiving the
> > searches and queries, setting up sessions, negotiating agreements and
> > privacy contracts, etc... Jabber cannot do the binary itself due to a
> > flaw in XML itself, not Jabber.
> 
> This is probably an elementary question, but...
> 
> Can the Jab-protocol transport binary encoded by stuffing it in between
> tags defined to hold CDATA in a custom namespace? (not proposing a
> method Xhex, UU, all the same to me)

        Base64 ?. (XMLRPC has a Base64 type tag -- so I assumed this much).
        
Gopal.V
-- 
 The difference between insanity and genius is only measured by success
 //===<=>===\\
|| GNU RULEZ ||
 \\===<=>===//