>DotGNU goal? (was Re: [DotGNU]Where can I learn about DotGNU vs Mono)

[S11001001]

Gopal.V wrote:
> 	We have all sorts of work -- we're not just limited to C#. 
> DotGNU is a very large project . Pnet is just what we have in
> common to Mono. What we do is "replace" .NET . One of our steps
> is "providing a free C# development environment" , it is a means
> and not an end (unlike Mono).

BTW, I had a look at the sample chapter of the long-delayed `C# in a Nutshell'. 
It gave a stat just to put things in perspective.

ECMA: ~220 classes
MS:  >3400 classes

Now, I realise that #of classes isn't a proper way of measuring code, but it is 
still an issue. Is "backward compatibility w/ MS" really a good goal for the 
project?

Oh, and I'm going to have to try and get coding faster....;)

Also, I would like a resource for the beginnings of the class library 
expansion. I am hoping for a not-so-MS solution, as the reason I added doc to 
the tasklist is because I would have rather learned C# from a GNUish source.

In fact, I should just mention this now...what will be needed is a C# tutorial 
with a bent towards FS and Pnet.

--
Be warned that typing \fBkillall \fIname\fP may not have the desired
effect on non-Linux systems, especially when done by a privileged user.
        -- From the killall manual page