Re: [DotGNU]A mention from Sun

[Barry Fitzgerald]

Andy Kilner wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 09 May 2002, Bill Lance wrote:
> 
> 
> Is this not essentially the wrong way round. The liberty alliance is just
> one of many possible athentication techniques. Rather than dotGNU becoming
> a member of the liberty alliance, shouldn't the liberty alliance become a
> subproject of dotGNU just as the other auth projects are. Unfortunately
> this will probably never be the case unless dotGNU really establishes
> itself with it's hopes of surpassing .NET, an ever uphill battle.
> 
> Still it is nice that dotGNU is on the minds of the /. masses and
> especially Liberty Alliance members.
> 


It suggests especially that we've been at least nominally successful
with our message and that the project has reached a level of cognitive
permanence -- which is a VERY good thing.  We're here to stay, and
nothing's going to stop that.

        -Barry