[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How portable is it ? (was: [DotGNU]Embedding Portable.NET)
From: |
Gopal V |
Subject: |
Re: How portable is it ? (was: [DotGNU]Embedding Portable.NET) |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jun 2002 23:37:11 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
If memory serves me right, Anselm Hook wrote:
> > But what about the *BSD , Solaris , and other *ix's ?
>
> I took a peek at porting it to OpenBSD 3.1 - treecc built ok - libffi 2.0
> has a link failure and I stopped there. I didn't have a chance to take
> much of a look at it other than applying patches from the openbsd ports
> for an earlier rev of libffi.
Have you tried the current CVS head -- without libffi ?
(./configure --without-libffi)
Just might work . Still that would confine your work to pure IL apps .
ie my libxml# won't work without libffi ;-)
Also there have been updates on libffi CVS lately to src/x86/ffi.c ,
would that help ?
Btw, IIRC you were trying to port pnet for 0.3.4 ? . try 0.3.8 :)
Gopal
--
The difference between insanity and genius is measured by success