[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DotGNU]Has anyone tried pnet + Rh 7.3 ?
From: |
Gopal V |
Subject: |
[DotGNU]Has anyone tried pnet + Rh 7.3 ? |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 01:33:19 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
Hi All,
Maybe it's not news that RH 7.3 is an unstable edition , but
since so many are using it , I would like to know the status of
pnet on RH 7.3 ...
The libgc supposedly needs some fixes , or are those fixes in
pnet CVS ?
Well Btw, I managed to boot all the distro's in my Hdd ;-)
and put pnet on a few friends' box.
portabiility index until now
Debian GNU/Linux Woody -- All OK (proxy:gopal)
Debian GNU/Linux Sid -- All OK (ajmitch)
Redhat GNU/Linux 7.1 -- All OK (gopal)
Redhat GNU/Linux 7.2 -- All OK (proxy:gopal)
Mandrake GNU/Linux 8.1 -- All OK (proxy:gopal)
Mandrake GNU/Linux 8.2 -- All OK (gopal)
Debian GNU Hurd ?.? -- All OK (ajmitch)
FreeBSD 4.? -- All OK (glenn chambers)
NetBSD 1.5.2 -- All OK (glenn chambers)
MAC OS X (Darwin) -- All OK (glen chambers & brandon bremen)
Cygwin (Win2K) -- All OK (rhys ?)
HPUX (64bit) -- Except libffi (james mc parlane)
Cygwin (Win9x) -- Check Unicode ?
OpenBSD -- Untested ?
Solaris 8 -- Untested ?
MAC OS 9 -- Possible ?
Redhat GNU/Linux 7.3 -- Untested ?
Debian GNU/Linux Potato-- Untested ?
That's it folks , (a sunday wasted ;-)
Gopal
--
The difference between insanity and genius is measured by success
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [DotGNU]Has anyone tried pnet + Rh 7.3 ?,
Gopal V <=