[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]UnManaged Pointers stuff (was: Weekend Warriors)
From: |
Gopal V |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]UnManaged Pointers stuff (was: Weekend Warriors) |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:30:41 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
If memory serves me right, Jonathan P Springer wrote:
> Hmm. Can some other WW take on the engine hacking responsibilities?
> I'm tapped out with coercion and typing at the moment.
Hack away at coercion !! ... I'm digging holes in the engine right now.
> > But I need a test case for this ...
>
> Me, too. I think it will fall out when I tackle the mathematical
> operators.
I meant a cscctest case .... I just am too much into books or ilrun
to get back into all this...
> It may drag me into the 'signed/unsigned' problem, which I've been
> meaning to tackle.
Hmm... that might solve this as well ? ... I think Rhys is slightly
incorrect about it failing on a 64 bit system ... In that case , we'll
be unable to use IntPtr(Int32) anyway and will have to use IntPtr(Int64)
for addresses :-)
/me is doing diffs with mscorlib.dll since I cannot test it by running :-)
Gopal
--
The difference between insanity and genius is measured by success
- [DotGNU]DotGNU Weekend Warriors, Peter Minten, 2002/10/12
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Weekend Warriors, Jonathan P Springer, 2002/10/12
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Weekend Warriors, Gopal V, 2002/10/14
- Re: [DotGNU]UnManaged Pointers stuff (was: Weekend Warriors), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/10/15
- Re: [DotGNU]UnManaged Pointers stuff (was: Weekend Warriors), Fergus Henderson, 2002/10/15
- Re: [DotGNU]UnManaged Pointers stuff (was: Weekend Warriors), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/10/15
- Re: [DotGNU]UnManaged Pointers stuff (was: Weekend Warriors), Gopal V, 2002/10/16
- Re: [DotGNU]UnManaged Pointers stuff (was: Weekend Warriors), Fergus Henderson, 2002/10/17
Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Weekend Warriors, James Michael DuPont, 2002/10/13