[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Working Groups plan v2
From: |
Mario D. Santana |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Working Groups plan v2 |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:01:05 -0400 |
Peter,
I like your proposal very much. It sounds like basic idea is that,
contrary to "common sense," the DotGNU SC can gain power by delegating
it. It reminds me of some of the better arguments from The Mythical
Man-Month.
A few questions: Will the WG's be responsible for their own organization?
How will the WG's formalize their goals and milestones, and report on
their progress?
Cheers.
mds
Peter Minten wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I worked out the Working Group plans a little more. The big change is that in
> this proposal the WG's will actually have the power to steer projects in their
> area. [...]
--
Too many people are thinking of security instead of opportunity. They seem
more afraid of life than death. -- James F. Byrnes
Re: [DotGNU]Working Groups plan v2, Eric Altendorf, 2002/10/17
best Dam*ed development environment revisited (was Re: [DotGNU]Working Groups plan v2), Stephen Compall, 2002/10/18