Re: [DotGNU]Working Groups plan v2

[Stephen Compall]

Sounds Good; here are my comments. BTW, I missed the "first" plan.

Peter Minten wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I worked out the Working Group plans a little more. The big change is that in
> this proposal the WG's will actually have the power to steer projects in their

How open will *membership* in a WG be?

> ensure DotGNU projects don't drift away from eachother and to preserve the goal
> of DotGNU (providing an Free Software alternative to .NET).

And, let's not forget, "the best damned development environment ever".

> In this proposal there will be 7 working groups:
> 1. Foundation code (pnet, dg-libs)

I think VRS and SEE really qualify as the "foundation", and pnet/dg-libs 
are the main track in VM development. But I'm biased ;)

> 3. Authorization (address@hidden)

Also the interoperable Virtual Identities systems, of which address@hidden 
is only one.

> 5. PR
> 6. Business

IMHO, 5 and 6 can be combined.

--
Stephen Compall
Also known as S11001001
DotGNU `Contributor' -- http://dotgnu.org

I think that freedom is more important than mere technical advance. I
would always choose a less advanced free program rather than a more
advanced nonfree program, because I won't give up my freedom for
something like that. My rule is, if I can't share it with you, I won't
take it.
        -- RMS