[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FW: [DotGNU]The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run
From: |
James Michael DuPont |
Subject: |
Re: FW: [DotGNU]The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 15:04:19 -0800 (PST) |
ok, sell it to you for one hour of gopal online bill.
we need to collect money to get the gopal online.
mike
--- Adam Treat <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Monday 02 December 2002 03:56 pm, Rhys Weatherley wrote:
> > Simon Guindon wrote:
> > I was suggesting a quick and dirty hack that will work only if the
> > user sets up their PATH correctly and does not use any MS
> application
> > that may depend upon their CLR. Providing the user a transparent
> > way to flip engines is not possible with this mechanism.
> >
> > Yhe Windows desire to "just click on it" is nonsense anyway. Users
> > don't click on .exe files. They click on icons or menu options.
> > It is pretty easy to associate an icon with "clrwrap blah.exe" and
> > make it so transparent that the user is none the wiser. It's only
> > a problem for people who run Windows apps from the command-line,
> > which is mercifully a very small set.
>
> Ok, so it will not be easy. I don't think overriding MS's CLR at all
> times is
> important, but overriding the CLR with pnet at specific times is
> important.
> IMHO, Portable.NET would do well to provide Windows developers with
> an easy
> and convenient (see: how they normally develop .NET apps) method of
> developing Portable.NET apps. This would entail the ability to
> launch PNet
> and or cscc when developing in Visual Studio.NET. I don't own this,
> so it's
> not very important to me specifically, but it would be a nice goal if
> PNet is
> looking to convert some windows developers. A good goal, IMHO ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Adam
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://www.dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
=====
James Michael DuPont
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
- Re: [DotGNU]The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run, (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run, James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/01
- FW: [DotGNU]The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run, Simon Guindon, 2002/12/01
- Re: FW: [DotGNU]The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run, Fergus Henderson, 2002/12/02
- Re: FW: [DotGNU]The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run, Gopal V, 2002/12/02
- Re: FW: [DotGNU]The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run, James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/02
- Re: FW: [DotGNU]The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/12/02
- Re: FW: [DotGNU]The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run, James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/02
- Re: FW: [DotGNU]The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run, Simon Guindon, 2002/12/02
- Re: FW: [DotGNU]The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/12/02
- Re: FW: [DotGNU]The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run, Adam Treat, 2002/12/02
- Re: FW: [DotGNU]The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run,
James Michael DuPont <=
- [DotGNU]PATCH pnet-mingw32 was (The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/03
- Re: [DotGNU]PATCH pnet-mingw32 was (The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/03
- RE: [DotGNU]PATCH pnet-mingw32 was (The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run), Aditya P. Bansod, 2002/12/03
- RE: [DotGNU]PATCH pnet-mingw32 was (The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/03
- RE: [DotGNU]PATCH pnet-mingw32 was (The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run), Aditya P. Bansod, 2002/12/03
- RE: [DotGNU]PATCH pnet-mingw32 was (The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/04
- Re: [DotGNU]PATCH pnet-mingw32 was (The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/12/04
- Re: FW: [DotGNU]The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run, Simon Guindon, 2002/12/02
- Re: FW: [DotGNU]The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run, Gopal V, 2002/12/02
- Re: FW: [DotGNU]The Mingw32 ilrun seems to run, Gopal V, 2002/12/02