[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ )
From: |
Gopal V |
Subject: |
[DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ) |
Date: |
Sun, 8 Dec 2002 22:00:34 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
If memory serves me right, Neil Cawse wrote:
> ** now adding C#
Could you point me to your source code ? ... (I've written 80% of my
generator in python anyway) .... I think it will be interesting to see
how your code handles function pointers , structs and tracing back typedefs
to their original types...
I have used Swig for python and found it grossly insufficent for my
work ... (easy, but not sufficent) ... I finally wrote my own wrappers
in C for Python ... which is a lot more flexible than SWIG ... I suppose
that might be true for C# as well ... But to be sure, I need a peek at
Swig - C#.
My PInvoke wrapper is built from the idea originated from Rhys with X11#.
Which is accessible from the dotgnu-libs CVS .. That concept of wrapping
code without C call-ins , is as portable as PInvoke ever gets ... (Rhys
is guy to follow for portability....)
Gopal
--
The difference between insanity and genius is measured by success
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., David Leimbach, 2002/12/03
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Neil Cawse, 2002/12/05
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Adam Treat, 2002/12/05
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Gopal V, 2002/12/06
- ADMIN: Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., David Faure, 2002/12/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Neil Cawse, 2002/12/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Neil Cawse, 2002/12/08
- [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ),
Gopal V <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Neil Cawse, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Adam Treat, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Adam Treat, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10