[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ADMIN: Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a
From: |
David Faure |
Subject: |
ADMIN: Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding. |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Dec 2002 10:30:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 December 2002 07:56, Gopal V wrote:
> If memory serves me right, Neil Cawse wrote:
> > So if you got down this far ;) now what you have is:
> > using a single command you can reuse all the great c++ libraries in c#.
> > Sounds good?!
>
> Good ... But Qt#'s generator seems to do a similar job of things ...
>
> > I think this route is the most robust and sensible way of reuse. Do you
> > agree? Will this be useful?
>
> Yes .... *very* useful ...
>
> > I need to finish the work and then convince Dave to add this into his Swig
> > project.
>
> I would also like a swig wrapper gen for basic C as well ... Is that on your
> list ? ...
Now that the subject is really moving away from C++ name mangling (which is
already off topic for kde-core-devel), please remove kde-core-devel
from the CC list in this discussion.
Thanks.
- --
David FAURE, address@hidden, address@hidden
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~david/
Contributing to: http://www.konqueror.org/, http://www.koffice.org/
Get the latest KOffice - http://download.kde.org/stable/koffice-1.2/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE98G5P72KcVAmwbhARAjoJAJ0crrqQRFsVBvEfP4q7uLa4IYoOXQCgnFnb
afvodXPZeDdc2K0TrYMGlRE=
=K6cw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/03
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., David Leimbach, 2002/12/03
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Neil Cawse, 2002/12/05
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Adam Treat, 2002/12/05
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Gopal V, 2002/12/06
- ADMIN: Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding.,
David Faure <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Neil Cawse, 2002/12/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Strategy for dealing with C++ virtual functions in a managed binding., Neil Cawse, 2002/12/08
- [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/08
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Gopal V, 2002/12/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Neil Cawse, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), James Michael DuPont, 2002/12/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ ), Adam Treat, 2002/12/10