[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Testing of ILASM:
From: |
Rhys Weatherley |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Testing of ILASM: |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Jan 2003 19:09:08 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
On Friday 03 January 2003 06:08 pm, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> I strongly disagree. Round-tripping can be an extreme powerful learning
> tool! Sometimes it's just way too much effort to write a complete IL
> program, but you can easily write it in C# (or more often, it already
> exists) and you can use round-tripping to tinker with the IL to study
> various aspects of the system (either the CLI or your app).
OK, I'll buy the learning angle.
From the FAQ:
Our disassembler and assembler don't support round-tripping,
although they use similar formats. If someone wants to submit
round-tripping patches, then that would be great. But it isn't a
high priority for us.
So, feel free to fix it if you think it is busted, and I'll integrate the
changes. It's already a little better since the two bugs from mdupont that I
fixed today.
I suppose it's the purist in me that favours well-designed tools over text
mode script hacks. :-)
Cheers,
Rhys.
- [DotGNU]Testing of ILASM:, James Michael DuPont, 2003/01/02
- RE: [DotGNU]Testing of ILASM: "Forward Tripping", James Michael DuPont, 2003/01/03
- Re: [DotGNU]Testing of ILASM: "Forward Tripping", Rhys Weatherley, 2003/01/03
- Re: [DotGNU]Testing of ILASM: "Forward Tripping", James Michael DuPont, 2003/01/03
- Re: [DotGNU]Testing of ILASM: "Forward Tripping", Rhys Weatherley, 2003/01/03
- Re: [DotGNU]Testing of ILASM: "Trippy Bugs", James Michael DuPont, 2003/01/03
- Re: [DotGNU]Testing of ILASM: "Forward Tripping", Fergus Henderson, 2003/01/04
- Re: [DotGNU]Testing of ILASM: "Forward Tripping", Gopal V, 2003/01/03
- Re: [DotGNU]Testing of ILASM: "Forward Tripping", James Michael DuPont, 2003/01/03
- Re: [DotGNU]Testing of ILASM:, Gopal V, 2003/01/03