[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]cscc symbol table and random question
From: |
CH Gowri Kumar |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]cscc symbol table and random question |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Feb 2003 23:44:29 +0530 (India Standard Time) |
> The conflict between inheritance vs visitors design of the compiler
> has effectively reached a truce with TreeCC . We don't need OO :)
TreeCC is really cool!! I have just started using it seriously and finding
it extremely helful.
> > At many a places i find that C++ features are being simulated using C.
> TreeCC ? . TreeCC has better features than C++ for building compilers.
ILCoder--the function pointers are members of the structure and later
intialize the function pointers to the actual functions.
Just thought if we could have a base class with all the pure virtual
functions and all the new coders derived from that.
Regards,
Gowri Kumar
- [DotGNU]cscc symbol table and random question, CH Gowri Kumar, 2003/02/07
- Re: [DotGNU]cscc symbol table and random question, Gopal V, 2003/02/07
- Re: [DotGNU]cscc symbol table and random question,
CH Gowri Kumar <=
- Re: [DotGNU]cscc symbol table and random question, Gopal V, 2003/02/07
- Re: [DotGNU]random question, CH Gowri Kumar, 2003/02/07
- RE: [DotGNU]random question, Aditya P. Bansod, 2003/02/07
- Re: [DotGNU]random question, j_post, 2003/02/07
- RE: [DotGNU]random question, Thong \(Tum\) Nguyen, 2003/02/07
- Re: [DotGNU]random question, j_post, 2003/02/08
- RE: [DotGNU]random question, Thong \(Tum\) Nguyen, 2003/02/08
- Re: [DotGNU]random question, j_post, 2003/02/08
- Re: [DotGNU]random question, Gopal V, 2003/02/08
- RE: [DotGNU]random question, Thong \(Tum\) Nguyen, 2003/02/08