Re: [DotGNU]Portable.NET Status 22 Feb 2003

[Marcus]

I don't quite understand the discussion about the organization of these 
generics. Hasn't M$ already specified this?



On Friday 21 February 2003 10:24 pm, Rhys Weatherley wrote:

> The rest of your proposal looks OK, except that I'd use "IDictionary"
> instead of "IMap", to be consistent with existing C# terminology.
>
> I'd like comments from others in the community on Thong's proposal.  Or any
> other bright ideas that people have.  Like I said before, all options are
> on the table.