[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]DrawString good and bad news.... / Freetype
From: |
Rhys Weatherley |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]DrawString good and bad news.... / Freetype |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:21:12 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
On Monday 29 September 2003 07:05 pm, Thomas Fritzsche wrote:
> Are there any tools in dotgnu to make some performence checks to see where
> all the time is lost?
"ilrun -M blah.exe" will tell you how many times each method is called. That
should give you some indication as to where the inner time-wasting loops are.
> How far is the C-Support of the dotgnu system? Is it possible to compile
> freetype with it to get clean il-code? Is the ilrun fast engough?
The C compiler system isn't really up to this task yet - not enough support in
libc for it. The Xft library uses freetype internally, and works OK on
modern versions of X. I suggest sticking with libX11 and libXft. Font
management is horrid no matter how it is done, and so we're better off using
a standard interface.
Cheers,
Rhys.