[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package
From: |
Gopal V |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:15:38 -0800 (PST) |
Hi,
> It doesn't matter. If you are providing binaries
> you need to distribute
> source, too. That's how the GPL works.
I can appreciate your concern over the sources
provided
for Cygwin1.dll . But I think half the projects in
sourceforge distribute cygwin1.dll with a Readme.txt
that says "The cygwin1.dll provided is from Cygwin
xx.xxx".
Anyway, this has gotten into a major debate on
the technicality of GPL ...
I just wonder... will static linking libcygwin help ?
(seeing that it's under a slightly different license)
Anyway nothing to see here folks, move on ...
Gopal
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Earnie Boyd, 2004/03/17
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Maciek, 2004/03/17
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Earnie Boyd, 2004/03/17
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Christopher Faylor, 2004/03/17
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Maciek, 2004/03/17
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Christopher Faylor, 2004/03/18
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Maciek, 2004/03/18
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Ilyak, 2004/03/19
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Norbert Bollow, 2004/03/19
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package,
Gopal V <=
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Christopher Faylor, 2004/03/19
- Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Norbert Bollow, 2004/03/20
Re: [DotGNU]PNet 0.6.4 - Windows package, Maciek, 2004/03/17
Message not available