[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#7700: closed (24.0.50; C-y binding withing Isearch mode)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 16 May 2011 12:42:54 -0300
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#7700: 24.0.50; C-y binding in Isearch mode
has caused the GNU bug report #7700,
regarding 24.0.50; C-y binding withing Isearch mode
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
7700: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7700
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.0.50; C-y binding withing Isearch mode
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:06:16 +0100
>
>
>
>
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Two common task performed when editing with Emacs are (a) Visit some file and (b) search for some text.
>
> In my case it often happens that the path of the file to visit or the text to search for is previously copied to the kill ring (or system clipboard), so that I, intuitively, yank it with C-y.
>
> This works OK when the operation at hand is to visit a file, but it doesn't in the search case, because in Isearch mode, C-y is bounded to another command: One that takes the text from point to the end of line as search text (which is of little use, IMO).
>
> Personally, I find this behavior inconsistent/annoying: I would expect that C-y within Isearch add text X to the search text, where X is the text that would be yanked in normal editing.
>
> One solution to fix this would be to swap the bindings of C-y and M-y withing Isearch mode. Of course I can do that in my .emacs, but if you agree with my reasoning, it could be make the default.
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> -- 
> Dani Moncayo
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#7700: 24.0.50; C-y binding in Isearch mode
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 16 May 2011 12:42:54 -0300
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> > I think this bug can be closed, because with the current trunk, I
> > already see the behavior requested in the OP, i.e. (within Isearch):
>
> Thanks, done,
>
>
>         Stefan
>
>
> --- End Message ---