[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#7228: closed (coreutils-8.6 sort-float failure on ppc)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2011 23:26:27 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#7228: coreutils-8.6 sort-float failure on ppc
has caused the GNU bug report #7228,
regarding coreutils-8.6 sort-float failure on ppc
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
7228: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7228
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> coreutils-8.6 sort-float failure on ppc
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:46:56 +0200
>
>
>
>
> Just tested 8.6 on linux glibc-2.11.1/gcc-4.4.5 LFS build on x86, sparc and
> ppc
>
> First a good news is that on sparc (32-bits), 8.6 test suite is now passing
> I didn't report yet a failure on misc/stty which was
> Failure was
> + stty -icanon
> stty: standard input: unable to perform all requested operations
>
>
> The bad news is that it fail now on ppc in FAIL: misc/sort-float
>
> + LC_ALL=C
> + sort -sg
> + compare out exp
> + diff -u out exp
> --- out 2010-10-16 13:40:44.000000000 +0000
> +++ exp 2010-10-16 13:40:44.000000000 +0000
> @@ -2,11 +2,11 @@
>  -1.797693e+308
>  -3.402823e+38
>  -1.175494e-38
> --2.004168e-292
>  -2.225074e-308
> +-2.004168e-292
>  0
> -2.225074e-308
>  2.004168e-292
> +2.225074e-308
>  1.175494e-38
>  3.402823e+38
>  1.797693e+308
> + fail=1
> ...
> + LC_ALL=fr_FR
> + sort -sg
> + compare out exp
> + diff -u out exp
> --- out 2010-10-16 13:40:44.000000000 +0000
> +++ exp 2010-10-16 13:40:44.000000000 +0000
> @@ -2,11 +2,11 @@
>  -1,797693e+308
>  -3,402823e+38
>  -1,175494e-38
> --2,004168e-292
>  -2,225074e-308
> +-2,004168e-292
>  0
> -2,225074e-308
>  2,004168e-292
> +2,225074e-308
>  1,175494e-38
>  3,402823e+38
>  1,797693e+308
> + fail=1
> + Exit 1
>
> Gilles
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#7228: coreutils-8.6 sort-float failure on ppc
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 31 May 2011 23:26:27 +0200
>
>
>
>
> Jim Meyering wrote:
> > Gilles Espinasse wrote:
> >>> > The bad news is that it fail now on ppc in FAIL: misc/sort-float
> >>> >
> >> It's ok now with the patch on ppc.
> >> It's ppc32, not 64 (gcc have --with-long-double-128 option if that matter)
> >
> > Thanks.  Adjusted.  I reproduced the failure also on ppc64.
>
> This was resolved, afaics, so closing.
>
>
> --- End Message ---