|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | bug#46852: closed (doc: Fix reference to the bind package variable name) |
Date: | Mon, 14 Jun 2021 02:35:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jun 2021 22:34:42 -0400 with message-id <87eed5tbr1.fsf_-_@gmail.com> and subject line Re: bug#46852: doc: Fix reference to the bind package variable name has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #46852, regarding doc: Fix reference to the bind package variable name to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact help-debbugs@gnu.org.) -- 46852: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=46852 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: doc: Fix reference to the bind package variable name Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 16:28:27 +0000 Change "bind" package variable name to the actual variable name, "isc-bind". --- Luis Felipe López Acevedo https://luis-felipe.gitlab.io/0001-doc-Fix-reference-to-the-bind-package-variable-name.patch
Description: Text Data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#46852: doc: Fix reference to the bind package variable name Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 22:34:42 -0400 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Hello, Luis Felipe <luis.felipe.la@protonmail.com> writes: > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > On Tuesday, March 2, 2021 11:53 PM, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> > wrote: > >> Leo! >> >> Leo Famulari 写道: >> >> > Is there a reason for this change? > > Oh, I should have said so in the commit message, sorry. The reason is > that if I add (list bind "utils") to the packages field in my > operating system definition, reconfiguring the system fails because > "bind" is a built-in Guile procedure, and so the package variable for > BIND is called "isc-bind" to avoid that conflict. Applied as 0b5120fb03db5226871b3482a72b1e6fdaa59ead, thank you! And thanks to Leo and Tobias for getting the matter clarified :-). Closing, Maxim
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |