emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#57592: closed ([PATCH 0/1] Add texlive-latex-frankenstein.)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#57592: closed ([PATCH 0/1] Add texlive-latex-frankenstein.)
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 13:10:02 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2022 15:09:15 +0200
with message-id <87pmfkaphg.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#57592: [PATCH 0/1] Add texlive-latex-frankenstein.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #57592,
regarding [PATCH 0/1] Add texlive-latex-frankenstein.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
57592: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=57592
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 0/1] Add texlive-latex-frankenstein. Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 10:48:14 +0200
Half-baked, but good enough to scratch my itch. Maybe it will be of use
for somebody else.

Wiktor Żelazny (1):
  gnu: Add texlive-latex-frankenstein.

 gnu/packages/tex.scm | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)


base-commit: 31b4eea5c0d361dfbca119c27cbc1e8c6f65782a
-- 
2.37.2




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#57592: [PATCH 0/1] Add texlive-latex-frankenstein. Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 15:09:15 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux)
Hi,

Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> skribis:

> Wiktor Żelazny <wz@freeshell.de> writes:
>
>> From: Wiktor Żelazny <wzelazny@vurv.cz>
>>
>> * gnu/packages/tex.scm (texlive-latex-frankenstein): New variable.
>> ---
>>  gnu/packages/tex.scm | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
> Thanks Wiktor, I did have a look at this, but I think it would be useful
> if someone more familiar with texlive stuff in Guix had a look as well.
>
> Given this is some kind of combination of bits, some of which may
> already be in Guix, I'm a bit hesitant about whether it's a good fit as
> is.

Apparently some (or all?) of the packages mentioned in the description
are unavailable in Guix, and I wonder if they’re in TeX Live.

So I went ahead and applied it.  We can always remove it later if/when
the individual packages are added.

Thanks,
Ludo’.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]