--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[PATCH] guix: Clarify what CRC is. |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Sep 2022 20:29:20 -0500 |
* guix/build-debug-link (Commentary): Clarify that CRC refers to cyclic
redundancy check.
[define-module]: Remove empty line.
---
guix/build/debug-link.scm | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/guix/build/debug-link.scm b/guix/build/debug-link.scm
index 9167737fb3..8fd90d951d 100644
--- a/guix/build/debug-link.scm
+++ b/guix/build/debug-link.scm
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
;;; Copyright © 2018 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
+;;; Copyright © 2022 jgart <jgart@dismail.de>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -28,7 +29,6 @@ (define-module (guix build debug-link)
#:export (debuglink-crc32
elf-debuglink
set-debuglink-crc
-
graft-debug-links))
;;; Commentary:
@@ -38,10 +38,10 @@ (define-module (guix build debug-link)
;;; create separate debug files (info "(gdb) Separate Debug Files").
;;;
;;; The main facility of this module is 'graft-debug-links', which allows us
-;;; to update the CRC that appears in '.gnu_debuglink' sections when grafting,
-;;; such that separate debug files remain usable after grafting. Failing to
-;;; do that, GDB would complain about CRC mismatch---see
-;;; <https://bugs.gnu.org/19973>.
+;;; to update the cyclic redundancy check (CRC) that appears in
+;;; '.gnu_debuglink' sections when grafting, such that separate debug files
+;;; remain usable after grafting. Failing to do that, GDB would complain
+;;; about CRC mismatch---see <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/19973>.
;;;
;;; Code:
--
2.37.3
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#57845: [PATCH] guix: Clarify what CRC is. |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Sep 2022 23:11:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
jgart <jgart@dismail.de> skribis:
> * guix/build-debug-link (Commentary): Clarify that CRC refers to cyclic
> redundancy check and fix broken link to issue.
> [define-module]: Remove empty line.
>
> Forgot to mention in the commit message that I also fixed the broken
> link to the issue.
>
> all best,
>
> jgart
Applied, but without the copyright line (expanding those three letters
is not copyrightable) and without the blank line removal (it’s here on
purpose to separate different levels of the interface).
BTW, the original bug URL is not “broken”: the page is just less
pleasant to the eye. :-)
Thanks,
Ludo’.
--- End Message ---