bug#64145: closed ([PATCH] gnu: yggdrasil: Update to 0.4.7.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 7 Sep 2023 20:26:58 +0300
with message-id <ZPoH4oAguY8pu00l@pbp>
and subject line Re: [bug#64145] [PATCH] gnu: yggdrasil: Update to 0.4.7.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #64145,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: yggdrasil: Update to 0.4.7.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
64145: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=64145
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] gnu: yggdrasil: Update to 0.4.7. Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 10:15:18 +0300 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)

Hello,

this patch series updates "yggdrasil" package to 0.4.7.

0001-gnu-go-github-com-arceliar-ironwood-Update-to-0.0.0-.patch
Description: Text Data

0002-gnu-yggdrasil-Update-to-0.4.7.patch
Description: Text Data

Thanks,

- avp

-- 
Artyom "avp" Poptsov <poptsov.artyom@gmail.com>
Home page: https://memory-heap.org/~avp/
CADR Hackerspace co-founder: https://cadrspace.ru/
GPG: D0C2 EAC1 3310 822D 98DE  B57C E9C5 A2D9 0898 A02F

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#64145] [PATCH] gnu: yggdrasil: Update to 0.4.7. Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 20:26:58 +0300

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:11:10PM +0300, Artyom V. Poptsov wrote:
> Hello Ludovic,
> 
> it seems strange to me that the Yggdrasil 0.4.7 derivation that
> bordeaux.guix.gnu.org tried to build has
> "go-github-com-arceliar-ironwood" version "0.0.0-20210912013146"[1] in
> the inputs.  I've updated the "ironwood" package along with the
> Yggdrasil itself and sent the both patches.  I have
> "go-github-com-arceliar-ironwood" version
> "0.0.0-20221115123222-ec61cea2f439" in my Guix version and everything
> builds fine on x86-64.
> 
> References:
> 1. 
> https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/gnu/store/yc9xpfnyjbsgmfm3iyf9gvv5bwdq2bcv-yggdrasil-0.4.7.drv

It built fine for me on my 64-bit systems. go-netlink, one of the
dependants, fails its test suite on 32-bit systems.

Patches pushed!

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---