|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | bug#65884: closed (29.1; prettify-symbols-unprettify-at-point documentation) |
Date: | Wed, 13 Sep 2023 20:47:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2023 13:45:47 -0700 with message-id <CADwFkmm7yEeQPG_B+bYjxUOH5Up_ovY7XdaQwU2G+dZisQ8gLA@mail.gmail.com> and subject line Re: bug#65884: 29.1; prettify-symbols-unprettify-at-point documentation has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #65884, regarding 29.1; prettify-symbols-unprettify-at-point documentation to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact help-debbugs@gnu.org.) -- 65884: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=65884 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: 29.1; prettify-symbols-unprettify-at-point documentation Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 21:20:25 -0700 I just learned about prettify-symbols mode and prettify-symbols-unprettify-at-point from Tony Zorman's recent blog post, so I tried it out, unsuccessfully at first...Recipe from emacs -Q:
In the *scratch* buffer:
M-x prettify-symbols-mode
(setq prettify-symbols-unprettify-at-point t)
C-x C-e ;; to evaluate the setq
lambda ;; the symbol λ appears
C-b
At this point, I'm expecting the symbol λ to deprettify back to
"lambda", but it does not.
Looking in the code in prog-mode.el, I see that the unprettification
needs to be set **before** the minor mode is activated in the buffer.Perhaps this should be pointed out in the documentation?
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#65884: 29.1; prettify-symbols-unprettify-at-point documentation Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 13:45:47 -0700 Version: 29.2 Peter Mao <peter.mao@gmail.com> writes: > I just learned about prettify-symbols mode and > prettify-symbols-unprettify-at-point from Tony Zorman's recent blog post, so > I tried it out, unsuccessfully > at first... > > Recipe from emacs -Q: > > In the *scratch* buffer: > M-x prettify-symbols-mode > (setq prettify-symbols-unprettify-at-point t) > C-x C-e ;; to evaluate the setq > lambda ;; the symbol λ appears > C-b > > At this point, I'm expecting the symbol λ to deprettify back to > "lambda", but it does not. > > Looking in the code in prog-mode.el, I see that the unprettification > needs to be set **before** the minor mode is activated in the buffer. > Perhaps this should be pointed out in the documentation? Thanks, I've now documented this on emacs-29.
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |