bug#72643: closed ([PATCH core-updates 0/6] Restore i586-gnu (GNU/Hurd) support)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 16 Aug 2024 19:56:45 +0200
with message-id <87ed6o5p2a.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: [bug#72643] [PATCH core-updates 0/6] Restore i586-gnu 
(GNU/Hurd) support
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #72643,
regarding [PATCH core-updates 0/6] Restore i586-gnu (GNU/Hurd) support
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
72643: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=72643
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH core-updates 0/6] Restore i586-gnu (GNU/Hurd) support
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 15 Aug 2024 18:54:59 +0200
>
>
>
>
> Hello!
>
> This patch series fixes Hurd support (i586-gnu) on ‘core-updates’,
> as described <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/72315>.  It does so by
> updating the ‘glibc-bootstrap’ tarball.
>
> I built the new tarball from the third commit and dropped it
> under gnu/packages/aux-files, which where the commit marked as
> “DRAFT” picks it up.  Of course we’ll change that to a URL at
> ftp.gnu.org/gnu/guix/bootstrap/i586-gnu once we agree on the
> strategy.
>
> For convenience, I uploaded the tarball here:
>
>   
> https://people.bordeaux.inria.fr/lcourtes/tmp/glibc-stripped-2.39-i586-pc-gnu.tar.xz
>   
> https://people.bordeaux.inria.fr/lcourtes/tmp/glibc-stripped-2.39-i586-pc-gnu.tar.xz.sig
>
>   nix-sha256: 0x2x6w611k6v9qdabacawamw2475p04hm3s0q95xcg063wjq4ig2
>
> I was able to build this successfully:
>
>   ./pre-inst-env guix build \
>     -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) glibc-final-with-bootstrap-bash)' \
>     -s i586-gnu
>
> I’ll try to build some more and see.
>
> I’d like to push this to ‘core-updates’ soon since it’s probably the
> last blocker before we can merge.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Ludo’.
>
> Ludovic Courtès (6):
>   gnu: make-bootstrap: Fix cross-compilation of ‘%glibc-stripped’.
>   gnu: make-bootstrap: Adjust ‘%glibc-stripped’ for glibc@2.39 on the
>     Hurd.
>   gnu: make-bootstrap: Include libdl.a and libutil.a in
>     ‘glibc-stripped’.
>   DRAFT gnu: glibc-bootstrap: Update i586-gnu variant.
>   gnu: perl-boot0: Use gexps.
>   gnu: commencement: Build ‘perl-boot0’ without stack protector on the
>     Hurd.
>
>  gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm      | 105 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>  gnu/packages/commencement.scm   |  45 ++++++++------
>  gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm |  27 ++++----
>  guix/build/make-bootstrap.scm   |  30 ++++++---
>  4 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 6fe957f749bc500bce49e4fa1cfa4d8c32227f32
> -- 
> 2.45.2
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: [bug#72643] [PATCH core-updates 0/6] Restore i586-gnu (GNU/Hurd) support
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 16 Aug 2024 19:56:45 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
>
>
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> skribis:
>
> > As mentioned on IRC, I've reconfigured my system to core-updates+this
> > patch series and it works for me.
>
> Pushed as 817838c38bbeb4ef7dcb64af5fce168aeb51306e, thanks for testing!
>
> > I'm using a close variant of the `devel-hurd.tmpl' from the hurd-team
> > branch
> >
> >     
> > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/system/examples/devel-hurd.tmpl?h=hurd-team
> >
> > and removed the new imagemagick dependency
> >
> > --- a/gnu/system/examples/devel-hurd.tmpl
> > +++ b/gnu/system/examples/devel-hurd.tmpl
> > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
> >  (define guix-packages
> >    (filter-map input->package
> >                (fold alist-delete (package-direct-inputs guix)
> > -                    '("glibc-utf8-locales" "graphviz" "po4a"))))
> > +                    '("glibc-utf8-locales" "graphviz" "imagemagick" 
> > "po4a"))))
>
> I’ve submitted a patch to remove it:
>
>   https://issues.guix.gnu.org/72674
>
> Regarding ‘hurd-team’, I admit I had forgotten about it.  What are the
> important things we should bring over to ‘master’ or ‘core-updates’?
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>
>
> --- End Message ---