[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: auto-save-file-name-transforms too simple?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: auto-save-file-name-transforms too simple? |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Nov 2001 21:29:02 +0200 |
> From: address@hidden (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 18:46:17 +0100
>
> For one thing, the default value is set up to put some auto-save
> files in the /tmp directory. This will fail on systems where /tmp
> does not exist, I think. Can we expect all systems to have that
> directory? What about Windows and MacOS?
It should use temporary-file-directory instead of the literal "/tmp".
- auto-save-file-name-transforms too simple?, Kai Großjohann, 2001/11/20
- Re: auto-save-file-name-transforms too simple?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: auto-save-file-name-transforms too simple?, Kai Großjohann, 2001/11/20
- Re: auto-save-file-name-transforms too simple?, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/20
- Re: auto-save-file-name-transforms too simple?, Kai Großjohann, 2001/11/21
- Re: auto-save-file-name-transforms too simple?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/21
- Re: auto-save-file-name-transforms too simple?, Kai Großjohann, 2001/11/21
- Re: auto-save-file-name-transforms too simple?, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/21
- Re: auto-save-file-name-transforms too simple?, Jason Rumney, 2001/11/22