[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MAINTAINERS file and .el files?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: MAINTAINERS file and .el files? |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 09:19:18 +0200 (IST) |
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Richard Stallman wrote:
> That definition is being deliberately unreasonable, and it would get
> in the way of work.
FWIW, it works very well in GDB development.
> If the GDB developers like it, then they can use it. We should not
> use it.
But we don't have _any_ definition whatsoever. I think we should have
one, otherwise I'm afraid we will be stepping on each other's toes
before long.
- Re: MAINTAINERS file and .el files?, (continued)
- Re: MAINTAINERS file and .el files?, Miles Bader, 2001/11/25
- Re: MAINTAINERS file and .el files?, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/25
- Re: MAINTAINERS file and .el files?, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/25
- Re: MAINTAINERS file and .el files?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/26
- Re: MAINTAINERS file and .el files?, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/26
- Re: MAINTAINERS file and .el files?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: MAINTAINERS file and .el files?, Miles Bader, 2001/11/27
- Re: MAINTAINERS file and .el files?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/27
- Re: MAINTAINERS file and .el files?, Miles Bader, 2001/11/27
- Re: MAINTAINERS file and .el files?, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/27
- Re: MAINTAINERS file and .el files?, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/27