[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1
From: |
Gerd Moellmann |
Subject: |
Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1 |
Date: |
30 Nov 2001 14:09:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1.50 |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> IMO, the image cache should have an upper bound to the number of
> cached entries, and some form of functionality to clean up the cache
> in case there are no (or very few) free entries.
Can you please explain why? I tend to think that such a limit would
rarely have the ``right'' value.
[...]
> can you say something about for how long an image must stay in the
> cache for the display engine to work?
There's no requirement except that images don't get removed from under
redisplay's feet, i.e. during a redisplay.
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/17
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/27
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/11/28
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Daniel Ortmann, 2001/11/28
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Daniel Ortmann, 2001/11/28
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/29
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/11/30
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Kim F. Storm, 2001/11/30
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1,
Gerd Moellmann <=
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Kim F. Storm, 2001/11/30
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/11/30
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/30
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/30
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/30
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Daniel Ortmann, 2001/11/30
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Daniel Ortmann, 2001/11/28