[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: decode-coding-string gone awry?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: decode-coding-string gone awry? |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:15:54 -0500 |
> (setq output (decode-coding-string output
buffer-file-coding-system))
And this decode-coding-string treats the internal byte
sequence of a multibyte string OUTPUT as utf-8, thus you get
some garbage.
Is it reasonable to operate with decode-coding-string on a multibyte
string? If that is nonsense, maybe we should make it get an error,
to help people debug such problems.
If there are some few cases where decode-coding-string makes sense on
a multibyte string, maybe we can make it get an error except in those
few cases.
- decode-coding-string gone awry?, David Kastrup, 2005/02/12
- Re: decode-coding-string gone awry?, Kenichi Handa, 2005/02/13
- Re: decode-coding-string gone awry?, David Kastrup, 2005/02/13
- Re: decode-coding-string gone awry?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: decode-coding-string gone awry?, David Kastrup, 2005/02/15
- Re: decode-coding-string gone awry?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/02/15
- Re: decode-coding-string gone awry?, Richard Stallman, 2005/02/17
- Re: decode-coding-string gone awry?, Kenichi Handa, 2005/02/17
- Re: decode-coding-string gone awry?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/02/17
- Re: decode-coding-string gone awry?, Kenichi Handa, 2005/02/18
- Re: decode-coding-string gone awry?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/02/18
- Re: decode-coding-string gone awry?, Richard Stallman, 2005/02/19
- Re: decode-coding-string gone awry?, Richard Stallman, 2005/02/18
- Re: decode-coding-string gone awry?, Richard Stallman, 2005/02/19