[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes to hi-lock before release.
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Changes to hi-lock before release. |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:47:42 -0400 |
> I don't see it. hi-lock-find-patterns takes no arguments
> and it never bypasses checking hi-lock-file-patterns-policy.
> How does it distinguish explicit M-x calls from calls that come from
hooks?
(when (and all-patterns
hi-lock-mode
(cond
((eq this-command 'hi-lock-find-patterns) t)
...
How does that distinguish explicit M-x calls from calls that come from
hooks?
If that really does work, then the text I wrote in the manual needs
correcting. Can you correct it?
- Re: Changes to hi-lock before release., (continued)
Re: Changes to hi-lock before release., Richard Stallman, 2007/04/21
Re: Changes to hi-lock before release., Richard Stallman, 2007/04/21
Re: Changes to hi-lock before release., Chong Yidong, 2007/04/21
Re: Changes to hi-lock before release.,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Changes to hi-lock before release., Chong Yidong, 2007/04/23
Re: Changes to hi-lock before release., Alan Mackenzie, 2007/04/24