[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should nXML be included
From: |
Peter Heslin |
Subject: |
Re: Should nXML be included |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:16:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.93 (gnu/linux) |
Leo <address@hidden> writes:
> I wonder if nXML¹ can be included.
Some years ago, James Clark posted a message to the nxml mailing list to
say that he would not have time to maintain it. If it were brought into
Emacs, that would help to avoid the potential for future bitrot -- and
for me nxml is one of Emacs' killer apps.
Peter
--
Peter Heslin (http://www.dur.ac.uk/p.j.heslin)
- Re: Multiple major modes, (continued)
- Re: Multiple major modes, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/06/12
- Re[2]: Multiple major modes, Eric M. Ludlam, 2007/06/12
- Re: Multiple major modes, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/06/12
- Re: Multiple major modes, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/12
- Re: Multiple major modes, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/13
- Re: Multiple major modes, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/13
- Re[2]: Multiple major modes, Eric M. Ludlam, 2007/06/19
- Re: Multiple major modes, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/24
- Re[2]: Multiple major modes, Eric M. Ludlam, 2007/06/25
Re: Should nXML be included, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/12
Re: Should nXML be included,
Peter Heslin <=
- Re: Should nXML be included, Leo, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, joakim, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, Peter Heslin, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, David Kastrup, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/13
- Re: Should nXML be included, Claus, 2007/06/13
- Re: Should nXML be included, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/14
- Re: Should nXML be included, Leo, 2007/06/14
- Re: Should nXML be included, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/15