[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Multiple major modes
|
From: |
Leo |
|
Subject: |
Re: Multiple major modes |
|
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:15:03 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 Emacs 23 (20070611) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Fedora 7 (gnu/linux) |
----- Stefan Monnier (2007-06-12) wrote:-----
>> and something that should be addressed without imposing restrictions
>> on specialized major modes.
>
> Actually, I think that in order to address it well, we will need to
> impose restrictions on major modes (though only on the ones involved
> in multiple-major-mode buffers) and maybe also on minor modes.
There seems to be a few multi mode implementation, what is the
preference from Emacs developers?
--
Leo <sdl.web AT gmail.com> (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)
- Should nXML be included, Leo, 2007/06/11
- Re: Should nXML be included, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, Jason Rumney, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, Peter Heslin, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, Jason Rumney, 2007/06/12
- Multiple major modes (was: Should nXML be included), Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/12
- Re: Multiple major modes,
Leo <=
- Re: Multiple major modes, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/06/12
- Re[2]: Multiple major modes, Eric M. Ludlam, 2007/06/12
- Re: Multiple major modes, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/06/12
- Re: Multiple major modes, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/12
- Re: Multiple major modes, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/13
- Re: Multiple major modes, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/13
- Re[2]: Multiple major modes, Eric M. Ludlam, 2007/06/19
- Re: Multiple major modes, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/24
- Re[2]: Multiple major modes, Eric M. Ludlam, 2007/06/25
Re: Should nXML be included, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/12