[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post-22.1 development?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Post-22.1 development? |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Jun 2007 14:51:25 -0400 |
I think it would be confusing if setenv and most particularly getenv
did not work for TERM and DISPLAY variables, and I see no particular
benefit to letting them stop to work mostly as previously.
I agree. We can write special case code to handle these two
variables in those functions.
If
setenv/getenv are to remain the preferred accessors, it seems
reasonable to gather the terminal-local variables in a single list in
order not to have to special-case every variable.
I disagree there. It is just two variables; handling each one specially
is not much complexity, and it is only inside setenv and getenv.
And separate variables will be more convenient for callers
of call-process, etc.
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, (continued)
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/15
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/15
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/15
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/15
- Re: Post-22.1 development?,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/06/04
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/06/05
Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/05
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/06
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Nick Roberts, 2007/06/06