[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Aligned blocks management: obsolete?
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Aligned blocks management: obsolete? |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:53:44 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
On 06/19/2012 09:51 AM, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> this cleanup assumes that every malloc implementation
> has reasonably efficient posix_memalign or memalign at least.
memalign might be dicey, as Stefan noted.
The gnulib documentation
<www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/posix_005fmemalign.html>
says posix_memalign is missing on some plausible Emacs porting targets,
and the gnulib implementation of pagealign_alloc says that
posix_memalign often wastes an entire memory page per call
(don't know the details about that).
- Re: Aligned blocks management: obsolete?, (continued)
- Re: Aligned blocks management: obsolete?, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/20
- Re: Aligned blocks management: obsolete?, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/20
- Re: Aligned blocks management: obsolete?, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/06/21
- Re: Aligned blocks management: obsolete?, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/21
- Re: Aligned blocks management: obsolete?, Richard Stallman, 2012/06/21
- Re: Aligned blocks management: obsolete?, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/20
- Re: Aligned blocks management: obsolete?, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/06/20
- Re: Aligned blocks management: obsolete?, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/21
- Re: Aligned blocks management: obsolete?, Wolfgang Jenkner, 2012/06/20
- Re: Aligned blocks management: obsolete?, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/06/20
Re: Aligned blocks management: obsolete?,
Paul Eggert <=