[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:13:02 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) |
Eli> FWIW, I always wondered why we don't use "-ggdb -g3" by default, when
Eli> GCC is the compiler.
Just '-g3' is enough (I don't think -ggdb has done anything important in
a long time). I think it would be a good change. I build Emacs (and
gdb and gcc) with -g3 routinely, as it makes debugging much simpler.
Tom
- Re: C backtraces for Emacs, (continued)
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/22
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Andreas Schwab, 2012/08/22
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/22
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/24
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Tom Tromey, 2012/08/24
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/24
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/08/25
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/26
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/24
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/26
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/08/22
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Richard Stallman, 2012/08/18
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/08/18