[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Mar 2014 16:27:51 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
It would be interesting to measure (somehow ;-) whether that "Emacs
leverage" is enough to preserve GCC's importance.
There is no way to measure such things -- they can't be known
in advance. What's clear is that we can either _try_ to support
GCC or else give up without a fight. We can't fight later
if we give up now.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, (continued)
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Stefan Monnier, 2014/03/01
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/01
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/01
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, David Kastrup, 2014/03/01
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/03/02
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/03
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/03/04
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, David Kastrup, 2014/03/04
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/10
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Stefan Monnier, 2014/03/10
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/10