[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sequence manipulation functions
|
From: |
Sebastien Vauban |
|
Subject: |
Re: sequence manipulation functions |
|
Date: |
Wed, 05 Nov 2014 16:52:58 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (windows-nt) |
Nicolas Petton wrote:
>>> ;;;###autoload
>>
>> It seems that pretty much all functions in this file are marked
>> as ;;;###autoload. In that case I think it's better to not mark any of
>> them as autoloaded.
>
> Yes, you are right.
Why? Isn't it still useful for packages in general (and ELPA in
particular) so that autoloads files are generated, and these only are
what's needed to be loaded... allowing performance gains at startup?
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
- Re: sequence manipulation functions, (continued)
- Re: sequence manipulation functions, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/05
- Re: sequence manipulation functions, Nicolas Petton, 2014/11/05
- Re: sequence manipulation functions,
Sebastien Vauban <=
- Re: sequence manipulation functions, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/05
- [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Nicolas Petton, 2014/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Daniel Colascione, 2014/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/10
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Nicolas Petton, 2014/11/10
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Nicolas Petton, 2014/11/10
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/10
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Nicolas Petton, 2014/11/12
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Bozhidar Batsov, 2014/11/12
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, Nicolas Petton, 2014/11/12