Re: Generalizing find-definition

[Helmut Eller]

On Thu, Nov 06 2014, Stefan Monnier wrote:

>> And if find-tag will provide the "multiple occurences" interface on
>> its own, there won't be a need for the "next tag" command.
>
> Good point.  If we don't have a such a global-map "next-tag" command
> anymore, then I guess it's OK to change M-, to do the job of M-*.

An idea would be to merge the next-error and next-tag commands. After
all, they are quite similar.

Helmut