[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: git apologia
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: git apologia |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Nov 2014 20:38:21 +0200 |
> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 19:20:51 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > No, bzr shows the merge-commit on the mainline, with a normal
> > (i.e. non-dotted) number. Only the commits on the branch from which
> > we merged are skipped by default by "bzr log".
>
> And how is that different from the counting of HEAD~n?
The merge-commits don't show using HEAD~n.
Here's an example. With the current trunk, the 10th and 11th entries
shown by "git log" are for merge-commits made by Stefan. But if I
type
git show HEAD~10
I see the 12th commit, the one by Oscar. And HEAD~9 is the one before
the two Stefan's commits.
By contrast, with bzr I do see merge-commits as if they were mainline
commits:
bzr log -c-12
118349: Glenn Morris 2014-11-10 [merge] Merge from emacs-24; up to 117702
Am I doing something wrong?
- Git's victory and an entertaining irony, (continued)
- Re: git apologia [was: git pull fails with merge conflicts. ...], Andreas Schwab, 2014/11/15
- Re: git apologia [was: git pull fails with merge conflicts. ...], Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/15
- Re: git apologia [was: git pull fails with merge conflicts. ...], David Kastrup, 2014/11/15
- Re: git apologia, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/16
- Re: git apologia, Andreas Schwab, 2014/11/16
- Re: git apologia, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/16
- Re: git apologia, Andreas Schwab, 2014/11/16
- Re: git apologia,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: git apologia, Andreas Schwab, 2014/11/16
- Re: git apologia, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/16
- Re: git apologia, Teemu Likonen, 2014/11/16
- Re: git apologia, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/16
- Re: git apologia, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: git apologia, Andreas Schwab, 2014/11/17
- Re: git apologia, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: git apologia, David Kastrup, 2014/11/17
- Re: git apologia, Achim Gratz, 2014/11/17
- Re: git apologia, Yuri Khan, 2014/11/17