[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Network security manager
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Network security manager |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:12:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4.51 (gnu/linux) |
Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
> It's an opportunity for a spinning 3-D EWW logo, so I wouldn't turn it down.
Heh heh heh.
>>> At medium or lower `nsm-security-level', I wouldn't expect to be queried
>>> in the case you describe. But at high or above, I would.
>
> LMI> If the certificate is invalid when we're visiting www.google.com, I
> LMI> think the default (i.e., `medium') setting should be to query the user.
>
> Right, sorry. By "queried" I meant "queried even if you're in a
> different buffer."
Yeah, if we already have the *eww* buffer and you've moved out of it, I
don't think we would want to query...
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: Network security manager, (continued)
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/18
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
- EWW buffers, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/19
- Re: EWW buffers, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- bug#19109: eww-setup-buffer: use set-buffer instead of switch-to-buffer, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/19
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- mailing control@, but requesting that no replies be sent there, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/23
- Re: bug#19109: mailing control@, but requesting that no replies be sent there, Glenn Morris, 2014/11/23
- Re: mailing control@, but requesting that no replies be sent there, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/24
- Re: mailing control@, but requesting that no replies be sent there, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/24
- mailing control@, but requesting that no replies be sent there, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/24
- Re: EWW buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/19
- Re: EWW buffers, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/20