[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Optional argument for `file-local-copy'
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Optional argument for `file-local-copy' |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Nov 2014 09:11:49 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Does "Agreed" means also you agree with the idea of that optional argument?
Thanks for getting us back on track. Yes, I agree with adding such
a functionality. But I have the impression that it's not enough: if the
caller doesn't know whether the file is indeed being cached or not, then
it doesn't know whether to delete it or not once it's done using it.
Stefan
- Optional argument for `file-local-copy', Michael Albinus, 2014/11/29
- Re: Optional argument for `file-local-copy', Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/29
- Re: Optional argument for `file-local-copy', Alan Mackenzie, 2014/11/29
- Re: Optional argument for `file-local-copy', Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/29
- Re: Optional argument for `file-local-copy', Alan Mackenzie, 2014/11/29
- Re: Optional argument for `file-local-copy', Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/11/29
- Re: Optional argument for `file-local-copy', Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/30
- Re: Optional argument for `file-local-copy', Michael Albinus, 2014/11/30
- Re: Optional argument for `file-local-copy',
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Optional argument for `file-local-copy', Michael Albinus, 2014/11/30
- Re: Optional argument for `file-local-copy', Michael Albinus, 2014/11/30