[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function liter
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:21:43 -0800 (PST) |
> > The goal is to add a new reader syntax:
> > #(foo bar) should translate to (short-lambda (foo bar))
>
> Thanks, but I'd strongly prefer not to baking this syntax into the elisp
> reader. IME, we tend not to use anonymous lambas enough to matter.
> Clojure is idiomatically pure-functional; we're not.
>
> I'd be more receptive to a generalized, CL-style reader-macro facility.
> You could then use that to implement this syntax, but locally.
+1 on all accounts, but especially for a CL-style reader-macro facility.
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/21
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, René Kyllingstad, 2015/01/22