|
From: | Oleh |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal |
Date: | Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:31:48 +0100 |
> Footnotes: > [1] ISTM that that goes without saying, given that Lisp having data > and code representations using the same syntax is advertised as an > advantage. I don't see a problem: (list (cadr #(+ % %)) (cadr #(+ % %)) (caddr #(+ % %)) (caddr #(+ % %))) ;; => ((%) (%) (+ % %) (+ % %))
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |