[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What's up with apply-partially?
|
From: |
Leo Liu |
|
Subject: |
Re: What's up with apply-partially? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 11:05:11 +0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (OS X 10.10.1) |
On 2015-01-24 06:14 +0800, David Kastrup wrote:
> `(closure (t) (&rest args)
> (apply ',fun ,@(mapcar (lambda (arg) `',arg) args) args)))
I have been wondering this myself. I wonder if it was a workaround from
the time when lexical-binding is not activated in subr.el?
The implementation does away `append' and is specially handled in
cconv-convert so it might actually be more efficient but I am just
wondering ;)
Leo
- What's up with apply-partially?, David Kastrup, 2015/01/23
- Re: What's up with apply-partially?,
Leo Liu <=
- Re: What's up with apply-partially?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/24
- Re: What's up with apply-partially?, David Kastrup, 2015/01/24
- Re: What's up with apply-partially?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/25
- [PATCH] Let apply-partially make use of lexical binding in subr.el, David Kastrup, 2015/01/25
- Re: [PATCH] Let apply-partially make use of lexical binding in subr.el, David Kastrup, 2015/01/27
- Re: [PATCH] Let apply-partially make use of lexical binding in subr.el, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/29
- Re: [PATCH] Let apply-partially make use of lexical binding in subr.el, David Kastrup, 2015/01/29
Re: What's up with apply-partially?, Artur Malabarba, 2015/01/23