Re: Unnecessary variable shr-start

[Tino Calancha]

On Mon, 5 Dec 2016, Hong Xu wrote:

> On 2016-12-05 Mon 00:25 GMT-0800, Katsumi Yamaoka <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 04 Dec 2016 12:01:57 -0800, Hong Xu wrote:
> > > That's exactly what I meant: Every time it is referred, it is bound to
> > > nil by a let.
> >
> > `shr-tag-a' binds `shr-start' to nil, runs `shr-generic' that
> > sets non-nil value to `shr-start' in the following way, and
> > refers to `shr-start'.
> >
> > `shr-generic' runs `shr-descend'
> > `shr-descend' runs `shr-tag-img'
> > `shr-tag-img' sets non-nil value to `shr-start'
> >
> > ;-)
>
> Such a complicated story! Thank you for pointing it out!
Yeah! It sounds amazing.  We should call it `shr-super-start'.