|
From: | Tino Calancha |
Subject: | Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature |
Date: | Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:55:12 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: | Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) |
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Philipp Stephani wrote:
Jordon Biondo <address@hidden> schrieb am Mo., 30. Jan. 2017 um 19:39 Uhr: Are maintainers and users still opposed to this change? If not I'd be happy to update the patch from the previous thread. As a user, I'm still opposed to this change. I don't think consistency is important enough in this case to justify the "worse" signature.
Why not to let people decide by themselves what is a better/worsesignature? Considering the opinions on this thread it's clear that better/worse are relative concepts here.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |